This was a really bad year.
I'm not joking, this is getting spoilered to high hell.
Right. I need to get what I saw of Star Wars: The Last Jedi down into something. I can't do Twitter because it's literally less than twelve hours since release so to say anything approaching spoiler territory, let alone actually spoiling a thing, would be suicidal. Same for Facebook. Needless to say, social media to discuss my thoughts, even brief outside something approaching 'OHMYGODINCREDIBLE' thoughts, is not gonna happen.
With that in mind, I'm gonna write down bullet point thoughts of what I seen last night and just process what I saw. This goes with the caveat that I mostly didn't go into it with a massive critical eye, that there is most likely a lot of recency bias here and excitement pre and post-viewing and a second viewing will happen next week to process what I seen and see things a bit more critically.
But I think I can say this before getting into the spoilered stuff that I fucking adored The Last Jedi, loved it. With that in mind, what you are about to read - in case this hasn't been made evident by now already - will be filled with spoilers. After quite a considerable chance to get out, everything, if not most things, will be spoiled for you. So get out if you want to be preserved before you see it. Or you've already seen it or just DGAF. Well, good for you. All the same, spoiler warning ends after the BB8 and Porg GIFs.
[SPOILER WARNING STARTS HERE]
[FINAL SPOILER WARNING]
[SPOILER WARNING ENDS HERE - BUT HERE'S THE GIFS ONE MORE TIME FOR SAFETY AND ALSO BECAUSE BB8 <3]
- Love they immediately jumped into the action. No waiting about, it went straight into it
- In watching all eight Star Wars movies, I don't think I've seen self-sacrifice done as wonderfully as Rose's sister. It sets up her arc well and gives purpose and meaning to her character
- This was a film which had actually a lot of comedic aspects to it, even down to Luke Skywalker nonchalantly throwing away his lightsaber. That shouldn't have been funny - but it just was. Even Chewie's bondfire dinner and eating a cooked Porg in front of live Porgs is actually a lot funnier than it was
- Me pre-TLJ: I do not get this obsession over Porgs. Stop trying to make them happen, Fetch. Me post-TLJ: I LOVE THE PORGS AND I WILL DIE PROTECTING THEM IF I ABSOLUTELY MUST
- "NO. FUCKING. WAY." I remember saying out loud to myself as I saw the outline of Yoda. Lo and behold, there he was. And I remember just smiling at the end of it after the subsequent conversation with Luke. It was pure fan service and I loved it
- Daisy Ridley and Mark Hamil's chemistry together is just fantastic. Absolutely fantastic. It was evident even in promotional stuff for The Force Awakens, but coming together for The Last Jedi, it just completely clicked off the bat. It was wonderful.
- The force connections at times between Rey and Kylo/Ben was odd to me at first, but as the movie wore on, it actually added more to the possibility of Ben turning - and maybe even the faintest possibility of Rey turning
- I'm going to write this in bold to emphasise this: Kelly Marie Tran is the best thing about this movie. Or at least one of the two leading best things about this film. Rose is as pure a character as they come - grieving at the loss of her sister, but called into action near immediately to help Finn, it's clear she's loyal, caring, funny and . The Monaco-like planet where Rose and Finn head to to get the codebreaker, played incredibly well by Benicio Del Toro, shows Rose not easily impressed with what is going on around her, even disgusted, considering how the First Order ruined her family's livelihood and how those she's currently surrounding herself are those making massive paydays in the weapons trade thanks to the war. I can't stress this enough, but adding Tran was just a casting stroke of perfection and I can only hope whoever made the decision gets a bonus of sorts, if not a pay rise, for casting her. For Tran herself, her star will grow massively after this and it is well deserved considering she puts in a star-making performance. And for Rose, having not only a massive POC character in the Star Wars canon but the first major Asian representation in the films will do incredible wonders for not only little girls in the same way Leia and Rey have done, but for POC children. If nothing else, it's something Tran can truly, truly be proud of
- Snoke getting killed off was actually a big surprise to me. I honestly didn't expect it to happen so soon. Likewise in turn, having it set up by Rey and Ben suggested maybe Ben is being turned
- Holy fuck that lightsaber teamup between Rey and Ben on Snoke's personal unit was brilliant
- In turn, the force fight between Rey and Ben (Kylo from here on out) was rather fun!
- Kylo taking up the mantle of Supreme Leader from Snoke after Hux's objections was a hell of a Vader-like moment
- Finn is underused a bit more than expected in the film, but still gets the job done when it shows with his partnership with Rose. And his battle with Phasma is brilliant
- Saddened Phasma seems to be done now and killed off. It seems pretty conclusive anyway considering how she went out so I wouldn't put money on an appearance in Episode IX. It felt like there was a lot of potential in her character that didn't really get a chance to come out, I felt
- As Finn is racing towards that big ass cannon that's firing up, I genuinely thought at one point they were actually going to kill him off. It actually felt like it was happening. Then Rose comes in with the save and crashes Finn off the path and I think, 'oh thank god' but then think 'DON'T YOU DARE KILL OFF ROSE ALREADY', especially after the moment had in the aftermath of the incident
- Also: that sequence pretty much kills off any chance of Finn and Poe. Although the end sequence suggests the possibility of a love triangle between Finn, Rose and Rey. Hmm.
- Luke's fight with Kylo, their final showdown, was fantastic, but kept thinking at first why isn't Luke going for Kylo in the same way Kylo was going for Luke. And then the reveal he actually isn't there but is rather a sort of force-like holographic representation (for lack of a better term) was rad. "I'll see you around, kid," was a hell of a way to sign off as Luke went the way of Yoda in a bit I really should have seen coming in hindsight considering what we seen earlier
- Which brings me to the second best leading thing about this film and, like above, I'm going to bold this: I am going to miss Carrie Fisher so much. Her final appearance as Leia before Fisher's unfortunate and heartbreaking death last year is filled with conviction, joy and heartbreak in equal measure. I felt certain they'd kill off Leia especially at the start of the film. And it felt like they pulled the trigger on it when their ship was bombed our by the First Order and killing everyone onboard (salute to you, Admiral Ackbar *salute*). And yet, she somehow survives thanks to what appears to be the Force. As the end of the film approached, she comes back strongwilled and in need to do something drastic to escape the First Order's pursuit of the Resistance. Her face-to-face with Luke is an incredibly hard-hitting, emotional moment, especially when in light of the Resistance about to seemingly lose everything, and had me welling up hard as Luke kissed her forehead. And as the movie comes to a close, giving one final message of inspiration in that the smallest spark can inspire hope as we see a wide pan shot of the main cast before showing a small boy, seen earlier in the mission Finn and Rose were on, wearing the same ring Rose is wearing indicating she was resistance. And I near fell into tears knowing that not only the final word of the movie would also be the last time we'd hear Leia, but have be something so meaningful too. It hurts even more knowing Episode IX was meant to be Leia's film in the same way The Force Awakens was Han's movie and The Last Jedi was Luke's. There'll be no one quite like Princess/General Leia Organa again. And in turn, there'll be no one quite like Carrie Fisher again. Godspeed, our Princess, our General. May the force be with you
- Rian Johnson proved his worth here and made a movie that was worth the build and more. Episode IX has an incredible lot to live up to, but Lucasfilm's decision to give Johnson a new Star Wars trilogy to be in charge of is looking like its already paid off in spades
- JJ Abrams delivered greatly with The Force Awakens, but he now has an incredible load of pressure to get the landing right for this trilogy with Episode IX. I can only hope he sticks it
- God, I've not even mentioned Laura Dern's turn as VA Holdo. Or Billie Lourd's low-key great performance as Lieutenant Connix
TL;DR - This movie was fantastic and I realise there is an element of recency bias saying that along with blind excitement post-viewing, which is why I'll go have a second viewing next week to go into it with a bit more of a critical eye on things, but I feel absolutely, positively certain I loved this a lot, lot more than The Force Awakens. And I loved The Force Awakens too.
See this film. Now.
[Content warning: This piece features talk of domestic abuse, child abuse and graphic talk of incredibly gratuitous violence. Discretion is advised]
Before I get into this, I should lay my cards out on the table here.
Detroit: Become Human and The Last of Us: Part II are games I am strongly looking forward to and therefore games I have a somewhat vested interest in. I've long been looking forward to Detroit since well before its official reveal at Paris Games Week two years ago, back when it was first shown in 2012 at GDC as a PlayStation 3 tech demo when a game didn't exist at the time. I felt that if Quantic Dream did a game based on that, they'd be onto a winner.
The Last of Us: Part II, well if you know me by now and seen the amount of things I've written on The Last of Us on this blog and elsewhere and listen to me speak of it, you'll know how much interest I have in seeing how this game pans out since its official reveal at PSX last year, even if I've long felt a sequel wasn't really needed and that The Last of Us 1 and subsequently Left Behind were a perfect one and done deal for me. Not to mention the fact that as well as The Last of Us being My Favourite Game™, Uncharted 2 lies in the lower end of my top ten games ever and that in three of the past four years, including this one currently, Naughty Dog's games have all been in my top ten games for the year (TLOU 1 at, well, one; Left Behind at four; Uncharted 4 at three and The Lost Legacy currently within my top five for the year as of writing this).
Needless to say, I am excited for Detroit, despite Quantic Dream's last game Beyond: Two Souls being a very bad game narratively and enjoying Quantic's other games in Heavy Rain (it's actually in my top ten games of the last generation) and Fahrenheit inspite of David Cage's writing and the final third going to shit in the latter. Needless to say, I am excited for The Last of Us: Part II despite the fact that maybe a sequel wasn't really needed in my eyes (even if it actually made business sense considering how much money it made and how many units it sold) or how, rather brazenly frankly, Naughty Dog casually threw off allegations of sexual assault recently.
So lets cut to yesterday at Sony's massive European showcase event at Paris Games Week. Brand new trailers for both Detroit and The Last of Us: Part II, the latter the first sighting of the game since its reveal before Christmas last year at PlayStation Experience.
The Detroit trailer had our first real look at what Kara's story arc will be since the game's reveal over two years ago where she was front and centre of it after the Kara tech demo of 2012. In it, she is an android servant to a man named Todd and his daughter Alice. As the trailer progresses, after a brief setup, Todd becomes more unhinged and lashes out at both Kara and Alice in what is clearly domestic and child abuse respectively. Regardless of the fact that Kara is an android, it's the optics of it that still shows here: a man getting violent towards a woman.
The trailer shows many narrative branches this story beat could take, including escaping from Todd but leaving Alice behind, protecting Alice, taking Alice away from Todd and at the end of the trailer, showing Todd being shot by Alice as he's about to attack Kara.
At first viewing, I felt nothing but excitement seeing the trailer for it.
To close the show, Sony aired out a five minute cut-scene trailer for The Last of Us: Part II. In it, it showed a group of four main characters plus two henchmen for the antagonist of the trailer. At the start of the trailer, you see a female character dragged to where she seems like she's going to meet her death. She has her neck roped and seems like she's about to be hanged for whatever reason before the villain has a knife at her torso and seems about to cut at it when she, the villain, is alerted to another captured character being dragged by other cronies to their position.
When asked where another member of the group is, the second captured character spits in the villain's face. "Clip her wings," the villain says before the second captured character is held down and has left arm graphically broken for all to see and is about to have her right arm broken before the third member in the party volleys off several arrows at the henchmen and kills them before the main antagonist is murdered and eventually cuts to black when a group of clickers show up.
At first viewing, I felt nothing but excitement seeing the trailer for it.
It was after the fact and seeing the reaction to it on Twitter that it had dawned on me. Whilst most people was were rightly critical of the fact, I felt nothing. I was desensitised to these problematic things. Rather, I was just excited to see more from these games I'm excited to see more of and play. And that left me in a kind of spiral in a way.
It felt like double standards too considering, to quote what I said to two people last night on Facebook, if this was any other game, I would be slaughtering it. Instead, I felt like a bad person for having such a massive disconnect with what was shown and reading the room, so to speak, and as a result, feeling guilty for not feeling something else beyond nothing or excitement to what were rather shitty things to begin with with child/domestic abuse and gratuitous violence respectively.
I'm still going to be excited for the games I'm looking forward to playing. That can't nor won't change. I refuse to let that change. But in future, I will learn to temper my anticipation and excitement so I don't feel such a massive disconnect in future when I see such problematic content in games. The thing is it's okay for us to like entertainment which has problematic material.
A few years ago, I wrote how the Metal Gear series is my favourite franchise in games despite the fact that the series has problematic elements and how Kojima's writing of female characters, at least from MGS4 onwards, "is a massively serious problem." Of course, it's mostly moot now Kojima's left Konami and no longer involved with the Metal Gear series, though I will now go into how he handles female characters as an independent creator with a lot more critical eye than I did when I wrote that piece a few years ago, starting with Death Stranding.
We can all enjoy stuff which has problematic content. But on the flipside, we should be judgmental and critical of it. Nothing should be or is off limits to criticism. Whether it's the content or the creators who help make the content. At the very least, lets try and be aware of it, if nothing else, being there.
In the light of day, The Last of Us: Part II cut-scene trailer was brutal and uncomfortable. That, there is no question and was definitely aired out of context. I think that's what annoys me about it now in hindsight, even if the content in question was - again - brutal and uncomfortable. It makes sense in the actual world of The Last of Us considering how dark and grim it is and with more context to it, it shouldn't be as horrifying as it was yesterday, albeit I felt that may have even went a bit beyond what was expected from the series. But lets see how its used in the full game first within context at least.
But Detroit: Become Human's showing of domestic and child abuse towards Kara and Alice in the trailer was met with scepticism because David Cage is not exactly the best writer (again, I loved Heavy Rain and liked Fahrenheit inspite of Cage's writing, not because of it) and not exactly someone who's known to have a deft touch when it comes to most, if not all, serious human issues.
That skepticism has now amplified tenfold. From an interview, conducted at an event to celebrate Quantic Dream's 20th anniversary, by Martin Robinson published on Eurogamer earlier today on yesterday's trailer:
Domestic abuse and child abuse is quite extreme as these things go.
David Cage: Let me ask you this question. Would you ask this question to a film director, or to a writer? Would you?
David Cage: You would ask the same question?
Yes. I'd ask the same question. Why is it interesting to you? Why did you want to explore domestic abuse and child abuse?
David Cage: Why did I want to do this? For me it's a very strong and moving scene, and I was interested to put the player in the position of this woman. I chose her point of view. If I'd have chosen the point of view of the man it could have been a totally different story and with totally different emotions, but in this case I chose her point of view. There's a context in the story, there's a reason for that - where she comes from and where she's going to go. What's important to me, and what's important in Detroit is to say that a game is as legitimate as a film or a book or a play to explore any topic such as domestic abuse.
I'm not disputing that at all. The concern I have is that it's using something like domestic abuse and child abuse - which is a very real issue for unfortunately far too many people - and using it as window dressing rather than exploring the ramifications of those issues.
David Cage: There will always be people thinking that we've used this... But I don't think that's what we do. If you look really into the game and if you play it you'll understand that the game is not about domestic abuse. It's a part of Kara's story - she's not a victim and she has a beautiful story. Hopefully you will be moved by what happens.
This just adds even more to the skepticism even more than it did yesterday. If anything, the Eurogamer interview not only actually significantly lessened my excitement for the game, but more importantly, it actually shows that Cage is putting in these issues of child and domestic abuse just for the sake of it, just for shock value in an attempt to further heighten his attempt on trying to tell a human story with androids when there are stuff out there that has done it better than what Detroit may do. Just look at Humans, Almost Human and Westworld. Even in games, there's Binary Domain and just this year alone, Nier Automata.
With The Last of Us: Part II footage, Naughty Dog and Sony deserve criticism for showing the video with no context, but at least context will be added when the game comes out. At least, that is the hope. But with the Detroit: Become Human trailer, and then today with the Eurogamer David Cage interview, it shows that that while games need to tackle these subjects, they need to be dealt with in a delicate and careful way. Right now, Quantic Dream and David Cage are not sending the best and promising of signals and messages in regards to Detroit.
(For victims of domestic and child abuse, if in need of help, please use these outlets. In the UK, call the 24 hour national domestic abuse hotline on 0808 2000 247 (for numbers elsewhere in the UK such as Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales plus numbers for LGBTQ victims of abuse, you can find those here). In the US, you can reach the national domestic violence hotline at 1-800-799-7233. For elsewhere in the world, domesticshelters.org has a massive list of resources for you to contact)
Erif klaw htiw em?
[With the return of Life is Strange with Before the Storm, I'm returning to my writing of the series as I did with the first main season of the franchise. Note that each entry, like before, will be spoiler-filled so only read if you've played it (or you DGAF, I don't care).
To read what I wrote about last time in 2015 in its entirety, hit this up.]
Yeah, I noticed it immediately.
Not hearing Ashly Burch as Chloe was jarring at first and it was immediately noticeable. But after a while, I had gotten used to hearing Rhianna DeVries, Chloe's new voice actor, and it was pretty close to what Burch had delivered with her performance at times.
Burch, who'd reluctantly stepped away from the role because of the ongoing voice actors strike, is still involved in the game, remaining as a writer. But as replacements go, DeVries is a great replacement.
The new actors for other characters who were in the main first season two years ago were a lot more noticeable than DeVries' turn as Chloe, however. Joyce doesn't quite have the same twang in her voice nor does David's. Those were the things I found more jarring, actually, than Chloe's new voice actress.
We've dealt with grief in many different ways. We've dealt with it in emotional ways. Angry ways. Even in ways that are unspeakable. For me, when I dealt with that three years ago, it was more emotional to the point I had left myself incredibly vulnerable. It was needless to say hard, as I have written on here a few times.
How I coped with it was games. A lot of games. And Frasier. Because why not.
Chloe's coping mechanism in dealing with her dad William's death a few years earlier is a bit more different than mine: a lot more angsty with a no fucks attitude. As you go through the episode, you unravel more of how Chloe is dealing with that grief whilst simultaneously letting it manifest to the point of letting it boil over, as shown near the end of the episode.
It's an angst, no fucks attitude with a side of vulnerability that comes out when she smashes stuff in the junkyard. First lamenting what happened a minute or two earlier with Rachel Amber (we'll get to her), the leaving of her best friend Max to Seattle and the death of her father particularly.
Even after all these years, I can still relate to the frustration I felt when my mum died. It's still something that - and maybe this isn't something I should say publicly admittedly, but fuck it - eats at me in various ways. So seeing that side of grief from Chloe was something that stuck out for me in a scene that was just brilliant.
There's a good chance there are some people who read this have had a friend who they've skipped school with to do shit. I nearly did it once with someone who was then a friend of mine but we only went as far as around the corner from the school. I was too chicken shit, but he wasn't. So I tried to hide around in the school theatre for the remaining 45 minutes left of the school day. It failed.
(Tip: don't return to the scene of the crime)
Which is why seeing Chloe and Rachel skip school oddly bring back memories of me and said 'friend' trying to dob out from class ('dob' or 'dobbing' is a Northern Irish term for skipping class, but who knows what the kids use these days to express such plans) in an oddly refreshing way.
The chemstry between the two immediately clicks and just as refreshing as the relationship between Chloe and Max in the first season of Life is Strange. Equally, Rachel opens herself up to be more vulnerable than Chloe does.
The two truths and a lie game the two play on the train heading out of Arcadia Bay was a heavy test in whether you can trust what someone is saying or not. As the episode goes further and further in, Rachel and Chloe develop more and more where there is something immediately there between them. Whether that is a friendship or something more is something the game actually throws at you as a massive choice at the end of the episode.
You see that there's stuff about both of them that feels like they're fucked up that just makes them feel a perfect fit for one another, no matter what choice you make. The next two episodes will be key in how Deck Nine Games continue to flesh that out, but this lends itself to a promising start.
There was one word I could think of by the end of episode one - fire.
Fire as in the massive forest bush fire that Rachel seems to have started after kicking over a burning bin in a rage with a burning photo of her and her dad she had just set on fire.
Fire as in that weird, kinda supernatural dream Chloe has near the end of the episode where Rachel is somehow on fire.
Fire as in even before the game came out, for better or worse (or even jokingly), this was suggested as Life is Strange's version of Twin Peaks' Fire Walk with Me, only with Rachel Amber taking up the more prominent (and alive) role than the main series in the same way Laura Palmer did in FWWM than the main Twin Peaks.
Having played episode one through now to the end now, there are elements that do remind of that Peaks influence and there does - at least in my view - seem to be a trace or two from Fire Walk with Me. But to outright say Before the Storm is Life is Strange's version of Fire Walk With Me in a non-irony free context is doing it a injustice, albeit with one episode down and two episodes to go.
There's still enough here that it stands out on its own. Here's hoping it stands out from that shadow even more in the next two episodes. That being said, it may not even be so much as it is less Twin Peaks and more a modern telling of Shakespeare's The Tempest (all three episodes are named after it and there are quite a few Tempest references in the episode).
Life is Strange: Before the Storm's lack of time-rewinding makes conversations and choices means the decisions you make have a bit more weight and permanence to them.
Its new talkback mechanic which sees you as Chloe have verbal one-on-ones with characters that also fits with her personality. For example, at the beginning of the episode, Chloe's comes up against a bouncer who won't let her in to see one of her favourite bands at what is otherwise a run down warehouse and filled with some of the shittiest people in Arcadia Bay, including a certain Frank Bowers from the first game.
Some of the responses you give are based on keywords mentioned by the person you're going up against. There are quite a few people in the episode you will have the talkback mechanic utilised, such as David and in a scene that involves Nathan Prescott after.
From this first episode, it feels easy to pick up on certain words and certain choices whereas with the two truths and a lie game played between Chloe and Rachel on the train, the game gave me reasonable enough doubt to pick a certain option. I'd love for the other two episodes to capitalise on that doubt and use it with talkback. But it's an interesting enough mechanic that it still works.
One of the big aspects of Life is Strange's first season was its soundtrack. It has for my money one of the best soundtracks ever in a game - licenced or unlicenced - and the way it used that soundtrack around certain scenes, from episode three's end with Mogwai's Kids Will Be Skeletons to the finale with Foals' Spanish Sahara (depending on what choice you made at the end) to Alt-J and Jose Gonzalez being played on Max's guitar, made it even more iconic.
Before the Storm's soundtrack this time is mostly original, with work entirely composed by band Daughter. That's not to say there won't be licenced works from elsewhere, but it is Daughter who provide the main crux of its soundtrack and score.
And from what the first episode contained in terms of music and samples, it works really, really well. I can't wait to listen to more throughout the series and to delve into the album when it comes out tomorrow (I think it's tomorrow?) but as first impressions go, it fits the tone of what Before the Storm is going for. Moody, dark, vulnerable. Just some wonderful standout stuff already.
It's one episode out of a three-part mini-series. But the first episode of Before the Storm was a home run for me. The story resonated with me big time, Daughter's soundtrack is just fantastic and Chloe's transition of Ashley Burch to Rhianna DeVries is surprisingly pulled off after a few minutes of getting used to it.
That's not to say it's perfect, it isn't. DeVries may have taken to her new role near immediately, but the newer cast for known characters didn't gel as well. And the controls in terms of the camera and character movement feel, for the lack of a better term, stiff.
Nevertheless, I'll admit that while I was excited for Before the Storm, I was still apprehensive about it considering Deck Nine Studios didn't have much narrative experience beforehand (in its past life as Idol Minds, it made PSN title PAIN and Cool Boarders). Not to mention the question that was a prequel entirely necessary?
The latter question is still up for debate, but the first episode of Life is Strange: Before the Storm near nails it. The season premiere sets up an interesting two episodes to come and I'll be going into episode two with a little less apprehension after this one.
Player statistics correct as of August 31, 2017
Pink. Purple. Blue.
[Hello. I'm a rubbish writer. I've not written on this blog in six months, thus ending my years-long streak of having at least one blog on here a month. Here's a big walloping one to follow up on my last blog posted here!]
A few months ago, I came out as bisexual. And I don't regret that. Except in one instance as part of the coming out period to a very small group of people. But I'll touch upon that further below. Basically put, with Pride Month starting to come to a head, I wanted to write about how I came out, why I ID as bi (and something else) and all the other things that came with it.
How I identify and the labels I use
I am a cis-gender white male who identifies as bisexual because it's an all-encompassing catch 22 term. It's better to refer myself as that rather than actual specific labels that suit me better that are under the bisexual umbrella. In fact, when I came out publicly, I remember asking a few fellow queer-identifying friends whether I was within my right to use the term queer despite coming out as bi.
In the end, I found bi was a better fitting label, but they all shared the sentiment that I could choose to identify as queer because it was within my right to choose it as part of my identity. At first, I identified primarily as bisexual and only lightly identified as queer, but now more and more, I'm starting to identify more and more as queer and bisexual - because hey, there's something empowering about identifying as queer (though I know some people still see it as a slur, which is fair game and an opinion that is absolutely and totally valid, but reclamation is a very important thing and for me, queer is part of that).
When I came out, the immediate family I came out to widely assumed that with bisexuality, it was a half-half interest into both male and female. Not quite. If anything, I still have a skewed preference for women. If I had to nail percentages, it's 70-30. While I do identify as bi, the specific label(s) I'd fit under as part of the bisexual umbrella is heteroflexible /heteroromantic. What do they mean? In a sense, it basically means that I am both romantically and sexually interested in women, but only sexually interested in men. That's not to say I won't ever rule out a relationship with a man, and it feels more likely than you may think. But for the most part, my biggest attraction is with women.
(this will also be the first time said immediate family finds out about specific preferences - hi!)
But because I have a preference in who I'd like to be with, romantically or sexually (or both), that doesn't make me any less bi or queer. If I like women more, that still doesn't make me any more straight. If I like men a bit less, that still doesn't make me any less gay.
Realising you finally had a label to fall under should usually be a relief. Obviously, I knew I wasn't straight beforehand - I've known since I think I was no earlier than 11 - and I knew bi would be a label I'd fit under, but I didn't know if I was deserving to have the bisexual label because of the fact I was merely only sexually interested in men, but both romantically and sexually interested in women.
I only discovered of the hetroflexible term and in turn the bisexual umbrella as part of Bisexual Awareness Week 2014 after seeing it posted on Twitter by two people I knew. And that's when everything finally clicked. I had found my label and felt I was more worthy of being a bisexual.
However, this revelation was not exactly something I was jumping for joy at. Not because of the thing itself, but rather outside events that were happening at the same time which affected my thinking at the time and was severely hampering one's mental health - primarily this (yeeeah, that was a fun time).
But the revelation I was worthy of being called a bisexual was a relief, as was the discovery of the specific label I fell under. But still, I was nowhere near ready to come out at that time. Especially with everything going on.
How I came out and the (massive) challenges they provided
It wouldn't be for another two years until I would actually come out to my first person, someone I've known for a long time, but had built a particular bond with over nearly the past year at that time. And I remember telling her and feeling a relief in telling someone. A kind of 'oh fuck' feeling even though I knew this person was going to be very accepting regardless. And she was when I told her on Halloween night last year.
The first two people I told were the two main people I wanted to tell, the others were on a kind of play it by ear basis. The second person I told, over the phone, was the kindest, understanding, accepting person I spoke to in coming out to someone. Out of anyone I came out to before doing it publicly, this person was the most important I had come out to. And I honestly couldn't have found a better person, a better friend to talk to about it.
Afterwards, I had sort of mixed results telling people. They were all kind and loving and accepting, but it was more the tone of what was said from most of them that kinda made me think twice. But there was one person in particular who I told in that group of people that would bite my ass big time when it came to privacy and trust.
To set the scene: from mid-November to mid-December last year, I had an incredible depression relapse. To say it was bad would be an understatement. It was incredibly awful that lots of stuff started swirling my head. I had a really bad depression episode one night. It was helped in part by my sister-in-law who I had an extensive talk to about things - including coming out to her (kinda out of necessity, but even then, I was still fine with coming out to her considering how brilliant she'd been with my mental health stuff) - but I was still kinda fragile that night. After getting some food, I went into see my cousin, who also is also my neighbor, for no particular reason other than to get a hug.
She then came visited me soon after and, in private, I told her I was bi (note: don't reveal super incredible life revealing moments with your mouth near full of food). I felt I was okay in telling her that considering I was starting to rebuild trust with her again after a significant falling out years earlier that only started healing as my other fell ill.
Big mistake. But I'll rewind to that below.
About five weeks later in January this year, considering some situations stemming from the start of the year within the immediate family and something ominous said by my sister (who did not know about me being bi until after the fact) thanks to, lets say, 'outside family' and a really awful dream, it was clear I had to come out for two reasons.
1) - This was starting to have a damaging effect on my mental health greatly 2) - The ominous thing implied was that someone could use something against me thanks to outside family - like, say me being bi (this wasn't aimed at me, but the thought of having someone reveal me being bi was going to happen before I had a chance to do it). Either way, I was going to make sure this wasn't going to have this be taken out of my hands
I called in two people - the first person I had told I was bi last October and my sister-in-law who I told last December - to have a private meeting and discuss how it would happen. What originally was going to happen was I'd separately come out the same day to both my brother and his partner (they also happen to be neighbors) and then later in the evening go to my sister and come out to her (she lives on the other side of the city) and then publicly come out to all my friends and family who I hadn't told the next night on social media.
But somehow, they all managed to congregate in the same place at the same time without prior warning - my brother's - so a on the fly decision was made to do it then and there. After some nerves and a tiny bit of apprehension, I sat down on a sofa and, in front of my brother, sister, two sisters in law (plus respective children) and sister's boyfriend, just spat it out. And then came the gushy shite, through which my first thought was "please kill me". But in all seriousness, they were super supportive. Incredibly so.
The plan was to still come out the next evening still to everyone else on social media to any friends and family who didn't know - including my dad (one, I don't ever think I could have done that one face-to-face because of sheer fucking nerves, but also two, he went off on a holiday to Spain without any warning a few days prior so *shrug*).
The day after I had come out to my immediate family, I found out my brother had actually been telling people beforehand when I said to him the previous day, 'don't say anything until I announce this proper'. He had told two of my uncles. That actually really annoyed me at the time, but whatever, it was a few hours difference (we're talking three or four hours when he told me). But what I had also found out was something more dramatic.
Remember when I said I came out to my cousin in December last year? Yeaaah. Turns out I really shouldn't have. Despite implicit warnings of disowning her if I found out she told anyone before I came out, considering the trust being built between me and her again, it turns out her dad - my uncle - actually knew of me being bi before anyone else in my family, telling my brother he already knew. And I certainly didn't tell him. Either she told him or she told her mum (we'll get to her) who then told him. And without knowing for sure admittedly, I wouldn't put it past her to have said it to other people as well before I came out.
Anyway, that evening, I came out publicly (the first link at the top of the post is the same text I used to come out to people on Facebook as well as using that blog post primarily for Twitter). And that was that. The reaction was incredible and positive. Me, I was in a massive anxiety spiral after posting with numerous panic attacks during the night, but it all cleared the next day.
The only negative response came six weeks later.
My aunt - the mum of that cousin I shouldn't have come out to - called me two homophobic slurs, gayboy and the f word (I ain't repeating it) after, long story short, verbally getting into it basically with said cousin's fiance.
To date, thankfully, it's been the only instance of homophobia I've had. But I realise there are others, particularly women and POC in the LGBTQ family, who've had it worse off than me. I'm trying - and going to keep continue trying - to support them. Not just out of solidarity, but because it's the most basic human thing to do - queer or not.
The aftermath and how being bi/queer makes me feel
In the six months since I've come out, what have I learned? I've learned that it does get easier with time as a few people pointed out. That coming out was one of the best things I've ever done and that I don't regret doing it at all, if albeit I would have done some things differently (like have tighter control on who I told). That seeing fellow friends and acquaintances talk of being queer on Twitter and Facebook genuinely makes me super happy and in a way kinda excited, knowing there is so much love in it. And that talking queer stuff with friends and other people makes me happy and excited in the same way games and other things I like do. It's wonderful.
If I can end this on one final note - it's this.
If you have a fifty-fifty split on liking both men and women or have a certain split ratio such as liking men more than women as a man and vice versa as a woman, whether you like the opposite sex more than same sex or whatever, you are valid enough. You are bi enough. You are queer enough. And how you choose to identify as such is yours to choose because, no matter your sexuality, you matter.
Note: The following below is the same thing I've just posted on Facebook. I'm too nervous to write two different things for social media and a blog, so here it is.